Cases 1 - 10 of 40,050
David Babb v. David Isom
as 24-1456
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY BABB
Defendant:
DAVID ISOM, General Manager for Safe Harbor, RUDY SOCHA, CEO, Wounded Nature Working Veterans, JOHN J. TECKLENBURG, Retired and others
Bunten v. Donat
as 24-1344
Plaintiff:
REGINALD BROWN, PATRICIA BUNTEN, TAMIE HOLLINS and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH DONAT, GEORGE GARRISON, WILLIAM HORTON and others
WILSON v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv04157
Plaintiff:
SALIK WILSON
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03637
Plaintiff:
Alan D Wilson
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wilson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00282
Petitioner:
Omar Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Young v. Wright et al.
as 9:2024cv03114
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Honorable Alan Wilson, Donald J Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02515
Plaintiff:
Lorren Wilson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Rachid Wilson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
In re: Kesean Wilson
as 24-1443
Petitioner:
In re: KESEAN CALVIN WILSON
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
