Cases 1 - 10 of 1,150
Physician's Central Business Office & Affiliates, et al v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 24-10817
Plaintiff:
PHYSICIAN'S CENTRAL BUSINESS OFFICE & AFFILIATES, MARIA CRISTINA CRESPO-SMITH, NESTOR JAVECH and others
Defendant:
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON
Joseph Roberts, et al v. Borough of Manheim, et al
as 24-1830
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ROBERTS, KIM ZAPATA, doing business as KIM'S CARS and KIM ZAPATA
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF MANHEIM, DONNA CZEINER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIALCAPACITY AS ZONING AND CODESOFFICER, ADRIN VARGAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIALCAPACITY AS ASSISTANT ZONING ANDCODES OFFICER and others
Garza v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01199
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Francisca Zapata Garza
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zapata v. Stefanski et al
as 1:2024cv03154
Plaintiff:
Luis F. Zapata
Defendant:
NYPD Officer Jeffrey Stefanski, NYPD Officer Christopher Bannon, NYPD Officer Simone Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kalamazoo Public Safety et al
as 1:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas
Defendant:
Kalamazoo Public Safety, Jordan Jacob, Eric Zapata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Colon-Zapata v. Garland
as 24-2255
Petitioner:
JAIME MANUEL COLON-ZAPATA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores v. Zapata County et al
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Baldomero Flores
Defendant:
Texas Zapata County, Jose Martinez and Fernando Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
