Cases 1 - 10 of 2,209
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ATLANTIC COAST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. A.M. BEST RATING SERVICES, INC.
as 3:2024cv05470
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC COAST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and SENTINEL SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
A.M. BEST RATING SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
A.M. et al v. SouthState Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv01636
Plaintiff:
A.M., M.M. and R.M.
Defendant:
SouthState Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Murphy et al v. Brixworth Homeowners Association, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Sean Murphy, Denise Pagels and V.M., A.M., E.M., A.M.
Defendant:
Brixworth Homeowners Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A.M. Cross Trade Logistics Network, Inc. et al v. McWilliams Collective, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
A.M. CROSS TRADE LOGISTICS NETWORK, INC. and JEMARA INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT SERVICES INC.
Defendant:
McWilliams Collective, LLC, Eric L. McWilliams, Cargo Link International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Manno v. McRae et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Dr. Francis A.M. Manno
Defendant:
Dr. Susan McRae, Karen Oppelt, Members of the IACUC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
A.M. v. Riverside County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
an individual A.M.
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriff's Department, County of Riverside, a public entity, Sheriff Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.M. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
A.M.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
A.M. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01732
Plaintiff:
A.M.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
