Cases 1 - 10 of 14
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
2022 ALACHUA COUNTY FLORIDA CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT ORGANIZATION LLC v. ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE BALLARD and 2022 ALACHUA COUNTY FLORIDA CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT ORGANIZATION LLC
Defendant:
STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE, BRIAN S KRAMER, HEATHER L JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. WELCH et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Defendant:
SARA Q. LOBNER, KELLY WELCH, WILLIAM L. OSTEAN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Defendant:
PAUL A. SHANNER, DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, ANTON T. MCALLISTER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Begum et al
as 1:2015cv11479
Plaintiff:
John Richard Ryan, Jr.
Defendant:
Arifa Begum and Abis Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Tatum v. David Clarke, Jr., et al
as 14-1007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. TATUM
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. CLARKE, JR., KEVIN NYKLEWICZ, PETER JASKULSKI, Captain and others
Tatum v. Clarke et al
as 2:2011cv01131
Plaintiff:
Robert L Tatum
Defendant:
David A Clarke, Jr, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin Nylewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02101
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Thomas v. City of Bay City Texas et al
as 3:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
Makeba D Thomas
Defendant:
City of Bay City Texas, Bay City Police Dept, Charles Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ingram v. Lindamood
as 1:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
Abie Ingram
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Lindamood
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
