Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Larry McGuire v. Enoch George, et al
as 14-6234
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LARRY MCGUIRE
Defendant - Appellant:
ENOCH GEORGE and DEBRA WAGONSCHUTZ, Lieutenant
Defendant:
ABL MANAGEMENT, INC., GENELLA POTTER and BUCKY ROWLAND
Bishop v. Allen County Sheriff et al
as 1:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Bryant L Bishop
Defendant:
Allen County Sheriff, Richard Horstmeyer, PE#168 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Karpells et al
as 3:2012cv00538
Plaintiff:
Sterling R. Rivers
Defendant:
Edward Karpells, Douglas Merideth, ABL Managment Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bostick v. Fries et al
as 1:2011cv00236
Plaintiff:
Henry Bostick, Jr
Defendant:
Ken Fries, Hart, Pamela Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURGESS v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2011cv00316
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID B. WILLIAMS, JAMIE MINOR, EQUITY BASED SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. Bodie et al
as 3:2010cv00561
Defendant:
Austin Bodie and ABL Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ledale Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Bodie et al
as 3:2010mc00009
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ledale Lee
Defendant:
Austin Bodie and ABL Management, Inc.
Gallipeau v. ABL Management Inc et al
as 3:2009cv01382
Plaintiff:
Dennis Gallipeau
Defendant:
ABL Management Inc, Correct Care Solutions Inc, Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Eaglin v. Metts et al
as 0:2008cv02547
Plaintiff:
Adrian Tyrell Eaglin
Defendant:
James Metts, ABL Management Inc, Barrington Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bomer v. ABL Management, Inc. Food Service Director and Dietition
as 3:2008cv00552
Petitioner:
Michael L. Bomer
Respondent:
ABL Management, Inc. Food Service Director and Dietition
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
