Cases 21 - 30 of 335
Jeriess Boulus v. ADT LLC et al
as 2:2023cv09225
Plaintiff:
Jeriess Boulus
Defendant:
ADT LLC, dba ADT Security Services, ADT LLC a Delaware corporation doing business as ADT Security Services and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Interested Party:
Apollo Global Management, LLC, The ADT Security Coroporation and ADT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jeriess Boulus v. ADT LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02070
Plaintiff:
Jeriess Boulus
Defendant:
ADT LLC a Delaware corporation doing business as ADT Security Services and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Brice v. ADT, LLC
as 3:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
RHONDA BRICE
Defendant:
ADT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Richard Escamilla, et. al. v. ADT LLC
as 5:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Richard Escamilla and Olga Escamilla
Defendant:
ADT, LLC doing business as ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Naomi Bar-Lev v. City of San Diego, et al
as 23-55475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAOMI BAR-LEV
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, JONATHAN DUNGAN, JASON LANGLEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Sidik v. Royal Sovereign International, Inc.
as 23-107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Sidik, as Administrator of the Estate of Kristen A. Sidik, deceased, as Parent and Natural Guardian of K.S., an Infant, as Parent and Natural Guardian of C.S., an Infant, Individually
Defendant / Appellee:
Royal Sovereign International, Inc., Royal Centurian Inc., RS Ningbo, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
