Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Martinez-Martinez v. USA
as 3:2022cv01433
Petitioner:
Alejandro Martinez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
(PC) Martinez v. Brandon et al
as 2:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Cesar Alejandro Martinez
Defendant:
Martin Brandon, Other Officers, Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Shawnee County, KS Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2022cv04029
Plaintiff:
Jeramiah Ray Spencer
Defendant:
Shawnee County Board of County Commissioners doing business as Shawnee County Department of Corrections, Alejandro Martinez, Isaac Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martinez-Hernandez v. Adducci et al
as 2:2020cv10964
Defendant:
Detroit Field Office Rebecca Adducci, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and Chad Wolf
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Martinez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Martinez-Hernandez v. Adducci et al
as 4:2020cv10966
Defendant:
Detroit Field Office Rebecca Adducci, Chad Wolf, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Martinez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
MARTINEZ-MATA v. BRADLEY, et al
as 3:2018cv00161
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ-MATA
Respondent:
ERIC BRADLEY, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alejandro Martinez v. USA
as 18-55735
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Martinez v. USA
as 3:2017cv01809
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alejandro Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martinez v. USA
as 3:2016cv02324
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Alejandro Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martinez v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv02957
Plaintiff:
Israel Alejandro Martinez
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
