Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Brian Taylor v. C. Carter, et al
as 23-2772
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN L. TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
C. CARTER, Deputy of Unemployment Insurance- Appeal Tribunal, DAWN GARDENHIRE, Claims Examiner- Appeal Tribunal, NANCY HUNT, Board of Review Member and others
Tafolla v. AM Retail Group, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Daniel Tafolla and Christal Robinson
Defendant:
AM Retail Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 df Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Brian Taylor v. AM Retail Group Inc, et al
as 22-1228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN L. TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
AM RETAIL GOUP INC, SHAWNDALE JACKSON, TRACEY GEORGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. AM Retail Group, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv00148
Defendant:
AM Retail Group, Inc. and G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Valencia Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Trotman v. AM Retail Group, Inc., d/b/a Wilson Leather Outlet
as 4:2020cv00125
Defendant:
AM Retail Group, Inc., d/b/a Wilson Leather Outlet and AM Retail Group, Inc., doing business as Wilsons Leather Outlet
Plaintiff:
Danielle Trotman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
BRIAN L. TAYLOR v. AM RETAIL GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03158
Defendant:
WILSON'S LEATHER, JEFF ACKMAN, AM RETAIL GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv80410
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv80778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
