Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Roland Graham, et al v. IRS
as 23-3001
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROLAND GRAHAM
Plaintiff / Appellee: CESAR SAEZ, CHARLES GREEN, Lieutenant, FERNANDO MIRAYE and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Roland GrahamIn re: Roland Graham
as 23-2914
Petitioner: In re: ROLAND GRAHAM
Respondent: CESAR SAEZ, CHARLES GREEN, Lieutenant, FERNANDO MIRAYE and others
US v. Andre Davis
as 23-4370
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ANDRE DAVIS, a/k/a 2 Chainz
Davis v. Stange et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff: Andre Davis
Defendant: William Stange, Latonya Young and Nina Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01757
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05667
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12377
Plaintiff: STEVEN ANDRE' DAVIS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roland Graham, et al v. Department of the Treasury IRS
as 22-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROLAND GRAHAM
Plaintiff: CESAR SAEZ, CHARLES GREEN, Lieutenant, FERNANDO MIRAYE and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Davis v. Doory et al
as 1:2022cv00588
Petitioner: Thomas Isiah Davis
Respondent: Timothy J. Doory, Steven Crowley, Thomas Ports and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52760
Plaintiff: ANDRE DAVIS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?