Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kuspa v. Deangelis et al
as 4:2026cv00946
Plaintiff:
Kaeleff Thomas Kuspa
Defendant:
Lori L. Deangelis, Beth A. Poulos, Kay Ellyn Brady-Hatfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. The Florida Bar et al
as 3:2026cv01875
Plaintiff:
Roderick Andrew Lee Ford
Defendant:
The Florida Bar, Joshua A. Doyle, Patricia Ann Toro Savitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ford v. Doyle et al
as 3:2026cv01307
Plaintiff:
Roderick Andrew Lee Ford
Defendant:
Joshua A. Doyle, Hon. Cecilia Altonga, Hon. Marcia Morales Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States v. Andrew Hawkins
as 26-1159
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew Lee Hawkins
Bertelsen v. Delafoisse
as 4:2025cv04251
Petitioner:
Andrew Lee Bertelsen
Respondent:
M.A. Delafoisse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bey v. Roc
as 25-2600
Plaintiff:
EMPRESS HADIYA BEY
Defendant:
JOEY BROCKINGTON, Former Police Officer, ELIZABETH BARNETT, JOE MORGANO, Esq. and others
Timothy Crane v. Chad Palmiter, et al
as 25-1927
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDREW LEE CRANE
Defendant:
CHAD PALMITER, Undersheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity, ROBERT MENDHAM, Sheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity, BRANDON SAJAK, Corrections Officer, official and personal capacity and others
HODGES v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2025cv00506
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL HODGES
Defendant:
WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SEGER and ANDREW LEE BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dilshod v. Scalfani
as 1:2025cv04927
Plaintiff:
Isakulov Dilshod
Defendant:
Andrew Lee Scalfani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
