Cases 31 - 40 of 9,094
Prince v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv01028
Plaintiff:
Robin R. Prince
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ronnie Todd v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, DBA Ramael Blackwell El, AKA Ramael Blackwell El Trust, DBA Ronnie Ramael Todd
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, ESTATE OF RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, ESTATE OF RYAN RAMAEL TODD and others
Jamal Parker v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, Jamal El Trust, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Jeffery v. Saul
as 1:2021cv06502
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Calvin and Calvin Jeffery
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Andrew M. Saul
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Desselle v. Saul
as 1:2021cv02213
Plaintiff:
Katherine Desselle
Defendant:
U S Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Poste v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jeannie M Poste
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
WILLIAMS JR. v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02098
Plaintiff:
TERRY D. WILLIAMS JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Respass v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anita Figgs Respass
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Lester v. Kijakazi
as 21-50628
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Byron Lester
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Bolter v. Saul
as 3:2021cv01272
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bolter
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
