Cases 1 - 10 of 21
ORTIZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03846
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Julio Ortiz-Lugo v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 23-2808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO ANGEL ORTIZ-LUGO
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
ORTIZ-LUGO v. BRITTIAN et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Petitioner:
JULIO ANGEL ORTIZ-LUGO
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv19741
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv14829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PEREZ-ORTIZ et al v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv16122
Plaintiff:
LESLIE PEREZ-ORTIZ and ANGEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION OF CLIFTON, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCFADDEN v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03779
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER BRIAN QUIRPLE, POLICE OFFICER JASON REID, POLICE OFFICER ANGEL ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. KLEMM et al
as 2:2018cv00547
Plaintiff:
LUIS ANGEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
ULLI/ULRICH KLEMM and KIRT W. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02940
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BOYER v. GRAHAM et al
as 2:2015cv01073
Plaintiff:
ANDRE BOYER
Defendant:
WURLIN GRAHAM and ANGEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
