Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Smith (PS) et al v. Marks et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Sanford Smith, Jr. and Angela Smith
Defendant:
Jonathan A Marks, Candlewyck Condominium Association, Hammersmith Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smiley Auto Group LLC v. Village Of Maywood et al
as 1:2023cv16333
Plaintiff:
Smiley Auto Group LLC
Defendant:
Village Of Maywood, Angela Smith, Walter Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carissa Brown v. US
as 23-6508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARISSA EUGENIA BROWN and HENRY BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARIA KATHLEEN VENTO, DAVID SHEPARDSON CAYER and others
Brown et al v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
Carissa Brown and Henry Brown
Defendant:
Maria Kathleen Vento, David S. Cayer, Benjamin Bain-Creed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Prator et al
as 5:2021cv00620
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Rick Farris, David Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
