Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 771
(PC) Harper v. Powell, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff: Daniel Harper
Defendant: B Powell, S. Arana, J Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vinyard v. Konrad et al
as 2:2024cv00943
Plaintiff: Joshuwa R. Vinyard
Defendant: Konrad, Arana, Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paramo v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10369
Plaintiff: Virginia Arana Paramo
Defendant: Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00374
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Arana v. USA
as 2:2024cv00204
Petitioner: Christopher Arana
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Arana v. Land O' Lakes, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff: Sandra Becerra Arana
Defendant: Land O' Lakes, Inc. and Kozy Shack Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01368
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Da La Mora (Huato)
as 23-8014
Defendant / Appellant: ADALID CABRERA HUATO, China, Arana and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: GIOVANNI DE LA MORA, ROGELIO RAMOS ROMAGUERA, TOMMY NEPONUCENO and others
Arana-De Ramos v. Garland
as 23-8007
Petitioner: ROSA DE LA PAZ ARANA-DE RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?