Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group v. A and J Tool & Findings Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00497
Defendant:
EEM, Inc., McDonald's Corporation, American Textile and others
Plaintiff:
Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group and Peterson - Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Ardagh Glass Inc
as 1:2017cv00393
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Ardagh Glass Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saxco International, LLC v. Wright et al
as 3:2017cv00849
Defendant:
Ardagh Glass, Inc. and Carson Wright
Plaintiff:
Saxco International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SPARTAN WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, INC. d/b/a SPARTAN LOGISTICS v. ARDAGH GLASS, INC.
as 1:2017cv01138
Defendant:
ARDAGH GLASS, INC.
Plaintiff:
SPARTAN WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, INC. d/b/a SPARTAN LOGISTICS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reed v. Ardagh Glass Inc
as 1:2015cv00188
Defendant:
Ardagh Glass Inc and Local 115T United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Bertram v. Ardagh Glass Inc
as 2:2015cv00775
Plaintiff:
James F Bertram
Defendant:
Ardagh Glass Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
