Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Braithwaite v. Guilette et al
as 5:2026ct03220
Plaintiff:
Akeem Braithwaite
Defendant:
Alina Guilette, Kelton Glorfield, J. Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Humbert v. Marshall et al
as 3:2026cv02040
Plaintiff:
Eric Humbert
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Michael Pugh, Marrcus Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(SS) Arrington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv02467
Plaintiff:
Darren Arrington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Arrington v. North Carolina
as 5:2026hc02118
Petitioner:
Raymond Arrington
Respondent:
North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv07601
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Arrington
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patrice Daniels, et al v. Eddie Jones, et al
as 26-2348
Plaintiff:
PATRICE DANIELS, ASHOOR RASHO, GERRODO FORREST and others
Defendant:
EDDIE JONES, Warden, WILLARD O. ELYEA, Doctor, WENDY BLANK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Young v. Ndolo et al
as 2:2026cv03589
Plaintiff:
Arrington Young
Defendant:
Paul Ndolo and Dooley Contracting Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Williams v. Dalton et al
as 6:2026cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Darrell Dalton, Dave Arnold, Emily Ragsdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
