Cases 1 - 10 of 148
FERGUSON v. MCDONALD'S
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JAMES FERGUSON, JR
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chappell v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1100
Petitioner:
ARTHUR JAMES CHAPPELL
Respondent:
STATE OF COLORADO and ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Griffin v. Omaha Police Dept.
as 8:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Omaha Police Dept and County Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chappell v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1033
Petitioner:
ARTHUR JAMES CHAPPELL
Respondent:
STATE OF COLORADO and ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Griffin v. Omaha, Cty- Prosecutor
as 8:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Omaha, Cty- Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Meyers
as 8:2023cv00491
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taft et al v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Taft, Jr, Arthur James Triplett, Jr, Jason Lee Cook and others
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Terry Branstad, Kelly Garcia and others
Interested Party:
Robert Thole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11057
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JAMES BROWN III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griffin v. Meyers
as 8:2023cv00421
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joiner v. King et al
as 3:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Latoya Joiner
Defendant:
William King, Arthur James, Jeremy Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
