Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Stoutamire et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad Stoutamire, Juan Provencio, Patrick Prudish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
STARK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11678
Plaintiff:
AARON RICHARDSON STARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Samantha Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04956
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00759
Plaintiff:
Jones, Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
McCartney v. Curl et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Rick L McCartney
Defendant:
Chase Curl, Zack Sebree, Aaron Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. USA -2255
as 1:2020cv01747
Respondent:
USA -2255
Petitioner:
Aaron Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
R.S. Means Company, LLC et al v. SED Associates, Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv10993
Defendant:
SED Associates, Corp. and Aaron Richardson
Plaintiff:
R.S. Means Company, LLC and The Gordian Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Arrowood et al v. All Four Seasons, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01209
Defendant:
Daniel L. Watkins and All Four Seasons, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Arrowood and Aaron Richardson
RICHARDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00406
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
AARON RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
