Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DOHERTY v. ADVANCED NEUROMODULATION SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv07195
Defendant:
ADVANCED NEUROMODULATION SYSTEMS, INC., ABBOTT MEDICAL and ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Plaintiff:
KIM DOHERTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brewer v. Kindreich et al
as 1:2026cv01933
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brewer
Defendant:
Honus Kindreich, Josh Abbott, Michael Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abbott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv02002
Plaintiff:
Christofer T Abbott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Lynch et al
as 6:2026cv02061
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Greer M. Lynch, David J. Smith, Tammy L. Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Hausey v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv10968
Plaintiff:
Raven Hausey
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Mead Johnson & Company, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Randolph Quintal v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 26-3290
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH QUINTAL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, CHRISTOPHER ABBOTT, JARRED BURNETT and others
Abbott v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv01385
Plaintiff:
David Abbott
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Abbott v. Monroe County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2026cv00437
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Abbott
Defendant:
Monroe County, Tennessee, Christina Brown and Alyssa Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
