Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Adams-Bell v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Reva V. Adams-Bell
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers Inc and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06467
Plaintiff:
Joseph Adam Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tehuti-El v. Bell
as 2:2022cv00099
Petitioner:
Ausar Tehuti-El
Respondent:
Adam Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tehuti-El v. Bell
as 2:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
Ausar Tehuti-El
Respondent:
Adam Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edge v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Derick T. Edge
Defendant:
Ronnie Lewis, Adam Bell and Mark Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOTEN v. BOHANNON
as 2:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS LEELON WOOTEN
Defendant:
Sheriff Preston Bohannon, JEFF DAVIS SHERIFFS DEPT, CAPT Adam Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. MELTON et al
as 2:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
KRISTAL CHEYANNE WALKER
Defendant:
Mark Melton, Adam Bell, Appling County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOTEN v. BOHANNON
as 1:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS LEELON WOOTEN
Defendant:
SHERIFF PRESTON BOHANNON, JEFF DAVIS SHERIFFS DEPT, CAPT ADAM BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. MELTON et al
as 1:2021cv00155
Plaintiff:
KRISTAL CHEYANNE WALKER
Defendant:
SHERIFF MARK MCHON, ADAM BELL, APPLING COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
