Cases 1 - 10 of 273
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv02621
Plaintiff:
Justin Ben Zvi, Alina Lukashevsky and Adam Merriam
Defendant:
Delta Dental of New York Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Martin, et al., v. Texas Association of Realtors, Inc., et al.
as 4:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Julie Martin, Mark Adams and Adelaida Matta
Defendant:
Texas Association of Realtors, Inc., Austin Board of Realtors, San Antonio Board of Realtors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Adams v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Derrick Adams
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Inc. and TransUnion
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Smart Communications Holding Inc, et al v. Global TelLink Corp, et al
as 22-3287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SMART COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING INC and HLFIP HOLDING INC, DBA Smart Communications IP Holdings
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOBAL TELLINK CORP, COUNTY OF YORK, YORK COUNTY PRISON and others
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2012md02311
Plaintiff:
A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc., AGA Realty LLC, Ifeoma Adams and others
Defendant:
AB SKF, ALPS Electric (North America), Inc., Alps Automotive, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Timmy A. Curtis, Sherman Bearings, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., Thomas Saris, Jim Sciaroni and others
Petitioner:
Sandra Singer and David Dishman
Respondent:
Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A. Inc.
In Re:
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Special Master:
Gene J. Esshaki
Intervenor:
Financial Recovery Services, LLC and United States of America
Claimant:
Certain End-Payor Settlement Class Members and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.
In Re: CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2023md03062
In Re:
CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANDERSON, FREDERICK C. CROSCUT, R & D ADAMS DAIRY FARM, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAY FARMS, DANNY DAY, JR. FARMS, DANNY DAY, JR. & SON FARM PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
HELENA AGRI-ENTERPRISES LLC, BASF SE, BASF CORPORATION and others
Interested Party:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-521
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats and Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-522
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats
Defendant / Appellant:
Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 4:2013md02420
Plaintiff:
A-1 Computers Inc, Jason Ames, Automation Engineering, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2007cv05634
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jung, David Murphy, Justin LaBarge and others
Defendant:
Air France, S.A., Qantas Airways, Ltd., All Nippon Airways and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Amy Yang, Xanadu Corp and David Gould
Claimant:
Michael Chekian
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
