Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mbaku v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01301
Plaintiff:
Jolie Mbaku
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Charles Schwab Bank, National Association, Charles Schwab Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Davis et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv02409
Plaintiff:
Aloysius Davis and Rhonda Burns
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., DISYS Corporation and Adecco Employment Services
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HEARBEST, INC. v. ADECCO USA et al
as 2:2013cv01026
Plaintiff:
HEARBEST, INC.
Defendant:
ADECCO USA and ADECCO EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Caldwell v. Adecco Employment Services et al
as 2:2009cv01037
Plaintiff:
David Caldwell
Defendant:
Adecco Employment Services, Adecco USA, Inc., Adecco Services, Inc. of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Carr v. Adecco Employment Services et al
as 3:2007cv00418
Plaintiff:
Yvette Marie Carr
Defendant:
Adecco Employment Services and Exel Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
