Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Nunez-Reynoso v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cabeza Robles v. Wait Pesterfield
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Augustine E. Cabeza Robles and Agustin E. Cabeza Robles
Defendant:
Wait Pesterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Calderon v. Norsworthy et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Agustin Calderon
Respondent:
Christopher L. Norsworthy, Angela N. Chavelier, Hollis Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. Norsworthy et al
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Agustin Calderon
Defendant:
Christopher L. Norsworthy, Angela N. Chavelier, Hollis Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Limon-Uribe v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01611
Petitioner:
Agustin Limon-Uribe
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
APODACA v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03610
Petitioner:
AGUSTIN FLORES APODACA
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(HC) Limon-Uribe v. Brewer
as 2:2023cv01125
Petitioner:
Agustin Limon-Uribe
Respondent:
Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Calderon v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02130
Petitioner:
Agustin Calderon
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARCIA v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02877
Plaintiff:
AGUSTIN GARCIA
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, INC., PATRICK A. NOGAN, EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
