Cases 11 - 20 of 180
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Burnett, et al v. Al Baraka Investment
as 1:2003cv05738
Defendant:
Ayadi Chafiq Bin Muhammad, Abu Rida Al Suri, Mohrez Amdouni and others
Plaintiff:
Janice K. Punches, George R. Bergin, Kimberly Franco and others
Receiver:
John A. Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 al Fed. Question: Airline Crash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Elghembri v. Muhammad
as 3:2023cv03328
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Chaplain Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AL-BAIDANY et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2005cv02380
Petitioner:
ZAKARIA AL-BAIDANY, ABDEL AZIZ AL-SWIDI, AHMED MOHAMMED HASSIN AL RAMMAH and others
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD HENRY RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
