Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Woodruff v. Greenburg et al
as 3:2022cv02788
Plaintiff:
Ivy Woodruff
Defendant:
Jonathan Greenburg, Charles Bryant, Jr., La Kesha Lee Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Butler et al v. Al Johnson Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00202
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Alexander McElroy and Al Johnson Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Butler and Bryan Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank v. Al Johnson's Swedish Rest.
as 19-1880
Appellee:
AL JOHNSON'S SWEDISH RESTAURANT & BUTIK, INC.
Appellant:
TODD C. BANK
Johansson v. Johnson
as 5:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Johnny Russell Johansson
Defendant:
Forrest Al Johnson and David Blalock, Sr., Deceased
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Gilford v. Town of Quartzsite, et al
as 14-16171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS C. GILFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF QUARTZSITE, AL JOHNSON, ALBERT JOHNSON and others
Jones et al v. Quartzsite, Town of et al
as 2:2013cv01770
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Jones and John Lavern Jones
Defendant:
Quartzsite, Town of, Jeffrey Gilbert, Sondra Gayle Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdo v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv05507
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Birdo
Defendant:
Al Johnson, Ralph Burkybile, Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NASHADDAI v. ANDREWS et al
as 4:2013cv00421
Plaintiff:
NYDEED NASHADDAI
Defendant:
DIANA ANDREWS, EDWARD D WATSON, JS MCALPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilford v. Quartzsite, Town of et al
as 2:2013cv00468
Plaintiff:
Douglas C Gilford
Defendant:
Quartzsite, Town of, Al Johnson, Rhonda Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Retail Plaza Inc et al
as 3:2012cv05001
Plaintiff:
Al Johnson
Defendant:
Retail Plaza Inc and Cory McCord
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
