Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Motley v. Janae Rocquel Motley Estate
as 24-1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY ESTATE, beneficiary JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY, DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS, DERRION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DERRION RASHAD BROOKS and others
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
janae rocquel motley
Defendant:
JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kenneth Brown, et al v. John Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-3459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN, Moor Beneficiary
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST, A Private Moor Aboriginal Virginian National Subject Ambassador At Large and Noble of the Al Moroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN, d/b/a Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, JANET LOUISE YELLEN, d/b/a Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, et al United States Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Merrick Gardland, et al. Attorney General, et al, United States Heirs and Assignees and others
Debtor / Appellee:
RALPH BREEDEN, III, d/b/a Ralph Breeden III et al d/b/a GA Bar No 195892 attorney at law Hayt, Hayt & Landau, P.L. Heirs and Assignees
BROWN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2022cv04790
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN D/B/A ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE, JANET LOUISE YELLEN d/b/a JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES, MERRICK GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03036
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Anderson Brown and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant:
antony john blinken doing business as ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN secretary of state, et al. United States, janet louise yellen doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States, merrick garland doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
May Chen et. al./Nation Healthcare Foundation v. Prince George's County et al
as 8:2017cv03274
Plaintiff:
May Chen et. al./Nation Healthcare Foundation
Defendant:
Prince George's County, FNA Maryland LLC/Benjamin M. Decker, Next Door Tenants et. al. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nevils v. Helper et al
as 3:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
Gene Nevils
Defendant:
Kim Helper, Tammy Reing, f/n/u Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevils v. Helper et al
as 3:2014mc00238
Plaintiff:
Gene Nevils
Defendant:
Kim Helper, Tammy Reing, f/n/u Rhodes and others
Nevils v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 3:2013cv01161
Plaintiff:
Gene Nevils
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Timothy Easter, Steven Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beverly Sevcik, et al v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 12-17668
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ALASKA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF IDAHO; STATE OF MONTANA; STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; and STATE OF UTAH, COLAGE, HAWAII PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAREN CAFFERATA-JENKINS, GREG FLAMER, SARA GEIGER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN E. SANDOVAL, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevada, AMY HARVEY, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Washoe County, Nevada, DIANA ALBA, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Clark County, Nevada and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
COALITION FOR THE PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
