Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Johnson v. NICS
as 22-1485
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
NICS, CJIS, Buffalo Police Department and others
Johnson v. NICS, et al
as 5:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
NICS, CJIS, Buffalo Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cynthia Miller v. Juanita Kodera et al
as 2:2020cv06343
Defendant:
United States of America, Al Sharpton, City of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cynthia Miller v. Juanita Kodera et al
as 5:2020cv01411
Defendant:
United States of America, Al Sharpton, City of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Enrique Zamarripa v. Louis Farrakhan, et al
as 19-10351
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRISSE CULLORS, MALIK ZULU SHABAZZ, NEW BLACK PANTHERS PARTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENRIQUE ZAMARRIPA
Anders v. Verizon Communications Inc.
as 19-191
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reggie Anders and Underdog Trucking, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Verizon Communications Inc., Reverend Al Sharpton, National Action Network and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 9
Heghmann v. Obama et al
as 2:2018cv00635
Defendant:
Rod Rosenstein, Robert Mueller, III, Alex M. Azar, II and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Heghmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Larry Klayman, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 17-10653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY KLAYMAN and DEMETRICK PENNIE
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LOUIS FARRAKHAN and others
Zamarripa v. Farrakhan et al
as 3:2016cv03109
Defendant:
Louis Farrakhan, Nation of Islam, Al Sharpton and others
Plaintiff:
Enrique Zamarripa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klayman v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv02010
Plaintiff:
Larry Klayman
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H Holder, Jr, Louis Farrakhan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
