Cases 21 - 30 of 741
Natty v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2011cv00093
Petitioner:
Therese Veronica Natty
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Charles Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Luna v. Gonzales
as 9:2010cv01111
Petitioner:
Worklis Luna
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Amicu:
Gelernt Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frederick Rolle v. USA, et al
as 10-3384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID G. LARIMER, MARION W. PAYSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
K. M. WHITE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leslie v. Mule
as 10-2115
Petitioner - Appellant:
Nicholas Leslie
Respondent - Appellee:
Charles Mule, Facilities Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, William Cleary, District Director, DRO Field Office and Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States
Frederick Rolle v. USA, et al
as 10-2055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID G. LARIMER, MARION W. PAYSON and others
Rolle v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00587
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Rolle
Defendant:
United States of America, David G. Larimer, Marion W. Payson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01581
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00111
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mitchell v. Virga, et al
as 4:2010cv00598
Petitioner:
Derrick A. Mitchell
Respondent:
People of the State of California, James Walker, Jerry Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
