Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Hendrich et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 4:2014cv01635
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. , Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hendrich , Loretta Ann Hendrich , Karen Klaseus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steck v. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06942
Plaintiff:
Richard Steck
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc., Thomas G. Dundon, Jason Kulas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
USA v. Juan Sanchez
as 14-40185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN ALBERTO SANCHEZ
Ibarra et al v. Kennedy Funding Incorporated et al
as 4:2013cv02371
Plaintiff:
Alberto Sanchez Ibarra , Martha Gayou Matiella , Alberto Martin Sanchez Gayou and others
Defendant:
Kennedy Funding Incorporated , Fuentes Gomez and Associates LLC, Ramon Alberto Fuentes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Herrera et al v. Best Utica Market, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv02972
Plaintiff:
Angel Tlalmanalco Baes, Manuel Bautista, Catalino Campos and others
Defendant:
Best Utica Market, Inc, Gi Seok Ryang, Hee Ok Ryang and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanchez v. Paramo
as 2:2013cv00491
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Petitioner:
Alberto Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanchez v. Paramo
as 2:2013at00251
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Petitioner:
Alberto Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jorge Sanchez-Zuniga v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72892
Petitioner:
JORGE ALBERTO SANCHEZ-ZUNIGA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00115
Petitioner:
Juan Alberto Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
