Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Leon-Alcazar v. Garland
as 24-3076
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE LEON-ALCAZAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Alcazar v. Sodexo Remote Sites Group, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Sherlyn M Alcazar
Defendant:
Sodexo Remote Sites Group, LLC, Harvey Gulf International Marine Inc and Subsea 7 LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 0901 Longshoremen Harbor Workers Compensation Act
Valenzuela Alcazar v. Garland
as 23-4404
Petitioner:
PAOLA VALENZUELA ALCAZAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Watkins et al v. Alcazar et al
as 3:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
Mikhael Watkins and Jackie Watkins
Defendant:
Miguel Alcazar, Iran Martinez and MDI Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
MONTOYA ALCAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13271
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIO MONTOYA ALCAZAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALCAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24177
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ALCAZAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALCAZAR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24115
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO ALCAZAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bemiss v. Alcazar et al
as 2:2023cv01481
Plaintiff:
John Bemiss
Defendant:
Andrew Alcazar, Russo and Steele LLC and Russo and Steele Phantom Equity Incentive Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Alcazar v. Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2023cv01996
Petitioner:
Everardo Alcazar
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
