Cases 81 - 90 of 117
State of Washington v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv03040
Plaintiff:
State of Washington, Deborah Oyer, National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M Azar, II, Diane Foley and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
American Medical Association et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00318
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Population Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
American Medical Association, Michele P. Megregian, C.N.M., Thomas N. Ewing, M.D. and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Oregon et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 6:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Essential Access Health, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 3:2019cv01195
Plaintiff:
Essential Access Health, Inc. and Melissa Marshall, M.D.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar II
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01158
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Odell, Jr., et al v. HHS, et al
as 19-15262
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT ODELL, M.D., PH.D. MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, A Nevada Corporation and ROBERT H. ODELL, Jr.
State of California, et al v. March for Life, et al
as 19-15150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MARCH FOR LIFE EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY and others
State of California, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 19-15118
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY, TEXAS, , ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, IDAHO, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, UTAH, and WEST VIRGINIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
