Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 117
Silverado Hospice, Inc. v. Alex M. Azar II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv01007
Defendant: Alex M. Azar and Alex M. Azar, II
Plaintiff: Silverado Hospice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Family Hospice Care, Inc. v. Alex M. Azar II
as 5:2019cv00950
Plaintiff: Family Hospice Care, Inc.
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
State of California v. Azar et al
as 3:2019cv02769
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar
Plaintiff: State of California
Amicus Curiae: Institute for Policy Integrity, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Legacy Community Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ambercity Hospice, Inc. v. Alex M. Azar II
as 5:2019cv00938
Plaintiff: Ambercity Hospice, Inc.
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Clemmensen v. Azar, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00936
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II
Plaintiff: Kirk Clemmensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 hr
Obria Group Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
as 8:2019cv00905
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Roger Severino and Alex M. Azar
Plaintiff: Obria Group Inc. and Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
State of California by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra et al v. Azar We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02552
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, Eric Wright, Bettina Joyner and others
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Connecticut, State of California by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Service Employees International Union Local 503, Kay Wright, Ed Solseng and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Essential Access Health, Inc., et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-15979
Plaintiff / Appellee: ESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH, INC. and MELISSA MARSHALL, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant: ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Amicus Curiae: SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY FEDERATION, FAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL, GLMA: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ADVANCING LGBTQ EQUALITY, THE HIV MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY, THE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE, THE SEXU, AMERICANS UNITED FOR LIFE and others
State of California v. Alex Azar, II, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-15974
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Amicus Curiae: SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY FEDERATION, FAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL, GLMA: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ADVANCING LGBTQ EQUALITY, THE HIV MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY, THE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE, THE SEXU and others
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant: DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae: SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?