Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03159
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03016
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01205
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01795
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera-Rivera et al v. Mennonite General Hospital, Inc et al
as 3:2026cv01006
Plaintiff:
Yariliz Rivera-Rivera, Angel Rosario-Amaro, Estate Anthony Rosario Rivera and others
Defendant:
Mennonite General Hospital, Inc, Alexander Castro-Acevedo, Alejandro Marmolejo-Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00547
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
USA v. Castro-Medina
as 25-50618
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Erlin Alexander Castro-Medina
Salvador Castro v. T. Cisneros
as 23-15993
Petitioner / Appellant:
SALVADOR ALEXANDER CASTRO
Respondent / Appellee:
T. CISNEROS
(HC) Castro v. Cisneros
as 2:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Salvador A. Castro and Salvador Alexander Castro
Respondent:
T. Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASTRO v. The University of Chicago
as 1:2020cv07280
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER CASTRO
Defendant:
The University of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
