Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAPPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09609
Plaintiff:
ALFRED WILLIAM CLAPPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. FCC Coleman I
as 4:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Terrick Alfred Williams
Defendant:
FCC Coleman I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Bullard
as 5:2023ct03104
Plaintiff:
Allen Littlejohn
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 4:2022cv00855
Petitioner:
Terrick Alfred Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CLARK v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, SHAWN LINDSEY BRITT, TONY BETHEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams et al v. Safford RV LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00088
Defendant:
Unknown Nunez, Safford RV LLC and Diane Nunez
Plaintiff:
Alfred Williams and Evelyn Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Thomas et al
as 3:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Harold Thomas, Dale Cook and Mississippi County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Alfred Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv19829
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
