Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ron Hunter, Jr. v. Rhoads
as 23-3046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RON ALLEN HUNTER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER RHOADS
Taylor et al. v. Ryder Transportation Solutions, LLC et al.
as 3:2023cv02049
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Taylor, Lisa Ann Taylor, Josephine Ella Rose Taylor and others
Defendant:
Ryder Transportation Solutions, LLC, Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
HUNTER v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
RON ALLEN HUNTER, JR.
Defendant:
SEYMOUR SUTTER, LT. VOLZ, WARDEN SUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. ERIE COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
RON ALLEN HUNTER, JR.
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY and THE GOVERNER OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Hunter
as 23-30220
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Allen Hunter
HUNTER v. RHOADS
as 1:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
RON ALLEN HUNTER, JR.
Defendant:
OFFICER RHOADS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. BARRETT et al
as 1:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
RON ALLEN HUNTER, JR.
Defendant:
DR. BARRETT, DR. KANG and Z. WAGGONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. WEBER
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
RON ALLEN HUNTER, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WEBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNLAP v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01047
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
ALLEN HUNTER DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Melodie Shuler v. Orangeburg County Sheriff'
as 20-6778
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT COYLER, In his individual and official capacity, ANDRE BRISBON, in his individual and official capacity as a deputy sheriff of Orangeburg Sheriff's Office, CHIEF KENNETH KINSEY, In his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELODIE SHULER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
