Cases 1 - 10 of 446
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant:
ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff:
James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sharplin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Defendant:
Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC, Cleveland-Cliffs Steel, LLC, Eagle, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Horace Sharplin, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
McGinnis v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
Bonnie McGinnis
Defendant:
Akebono Brake Corporation, ArvinMeritor, Inc., BWDAC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Attebury et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv05014
Plaintiff:
Ervel Attebury and Lutrecia Attebury
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Wright et al v. Cummins Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10496
Plaintiff:
Bruce S Wright and Louise K Wright
Cross Claimant:
Cummins Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., IMO Industries Inc. and others
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to The Cooper-Bessemer Corporation, Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
General Electric Company, ITT LLC, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Turner et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv12456
Defendant:
Fort Kent Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Dunham-Bush, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Harsco Corporation f/k/a The Patterson-Kelley Co., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Viking Pump, Inc., Grinnell LLC, Twin Disc, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sally Turner and Donald Turner, Jr.
Cross Claimant:
General Dynamics Corporation, Honeywell International Inc., Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Silva v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation, et al
as 2:2023cv01762
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Curtiss-Wright Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
James Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hoff et al v. AVCO Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01315
Defendant:
CNA Holdings, LLC, Cooper Industries, LLC, DCO, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Hoff and Nancy B. Hoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Medeiros, Jr. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv12516
Defendant:
SB Decking, Inc. f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Company, PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. as Successor-in-Interest to Akzo Nobel Paints LLC f/k/a The Glidden Company, Bird, Inc. a/k/a Bird and Son, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Bayer Cropscience, Inc. as Successor to Amchem, Inc., New England Insulation Company, General Electric Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Ingersoll-Rand Company, Turner Construction Company, Eugene R. Medeiros, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Hardy v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2017cv10826
Defendant:
Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
FMC Corporation and Bayer Cropscience, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Riley Power Inc., A. W. Chesterton Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Hardy
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
