Cases 1 - 10 of 549
(PC) Martinez, Jr. v. Pogue et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Joe Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyson Pogue, Jason Quick, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03291
Plaintiff:
Clayton Howard
Defendant:
State Of New York, City of New York, Richmond County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Booth v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge, Lopez, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Casas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01355
Plaintiff:
Alva De Casas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson v. So-Thorn Therapeutic Health Cannabinoids, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Patterson
Defendant:
So-Thorn Therapeutic Health Cannabinoids, LLC, SoThorn, LLC and Alva Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Alva-Joya v. USA
as 4:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Ali Alva-Joya
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis et al v. Alva Cano Rodenixto et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Tyreek Davis and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Abner Alva Cano Rodenixto, Mark Sawyer, C. Rivas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
