Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Walker v. Travis County, Texas
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Jason Walker
Defendant:
Travis County, Texas, Amber Jones, Vivian Pan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06682
Plaintiff:
Amber Jones, M. W. and L. W.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Dolgencorp, LLC, Walgreen, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01281
Petitioner:
AMBER JONES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv17759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mighty Siren LLC et al v. Bates et al
as 5:2021cv00788
Plaintiff:
Mighty Siren LLC, Redbud2020, Ledger Gypsy LLC and others
Defendant:
Brent Bates, Andrew Taylor and Sensible Wellness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2021cv00065
Defendant:
Jane Ammons Gilchrist, Antwan Rayshawn Hamilton and NC Department of Safety
Plaintiff:
Amber Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hamilton et al
as 5:2021ct03122
Defendant:
Jane Ammons Gilchrist, Antwan Rayshawn Hamilton and NC Department of Safety
Plaintiff:
Amber Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
