Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tisdale v. BRIDGECREST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2026cv01535
Plaintiff:
Elijah Tisdale
Defendant:
BRIDGECREST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, AMERICAN RECOVERY CORPORATION, JOHN DOE-REPO AGENT 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shahood v. Toyota Financial Services et al
as 2:2026cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jennifer P. Shahood
Defendant:
Toyota Financial Services, Vincent Bray, April W. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gonzalez v. American Recovery Service, Inc.
as 3:2026cv03111
Plaintiff:
Alexis L. Gonzalez
Defendant:
American Recovery Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross-Complainant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross-Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
