Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00413
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Utility Workers United Associa v. Pennsylvania American Water Co
as 20-1461
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA AMERICAN WATER CO, a Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UTILITY WORKERS UNITED ASSOCIATION LOCAL 537, an unincorporated association, by J. Kevin Booth, its Trustee ad Litem
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA-AMERICAN WATER CO.
as 5:2018cv00432
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA-AMERICAN WATER CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOORSEN v. AMERICAN WATER CO. et al
as 1:2017cv00438
Defendant:
AMERICAN WATER CO. and INDIANA WATER CO.
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. KOORSEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA-AMERICAN WATER CO.
as 5:2016cv04701
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA-AMERICAN WATER CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NLRB v. Pennsylvania American Water Co
as 15-1917
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor - Respondent:
UNTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA AFL CIO SYSTEM LOCAL 537
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA AMERICAN WATER CO
Pennsylvania American Water Co v. NLRB
as 15-1694
Petitioner:
PENNSYLVANIA AMERICAN WATER CO
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00761
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
