Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Leathers et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Anne M Leathers, Michael Roe, Jr., Lonnie Pittman and others
Defendant:
United States, Joseph R Biden, Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Young v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Amy Kathryn Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Ward et al v. Warren et al
as 4:2018cv00069
Respondent:
Cheryl Fisk, Stedman Payne, Tim Barber and others
Petitioner:
Amie Hodges Young, Janis Ward, Lori Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILISTIN v. Backman et al
as 0:2014cv62569
Plaintiff:
Jeffney Philistin
Defendant:
Paul L. Backman, Victor Tobin, Michael J. Satz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Young et al
as 1:2013cv03111
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael B. Young and Amy J. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Young v. Shanahan
as 2:2010cv01049
Plaintiff:
Amy M Young
Defendant:
Terrence A Shanahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
