Cases 1 - 10 of 18
HARGETT v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN A. HARGETT
Defendant:
AMY COLLINS, NORMA BLACKSHEAR, WAYNE BRATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARGETT v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER HARGETT
Defendant:
AMY COLLINS, DANIEL HEADRIX, NORMA BLACKSHEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARGETT v. VIRGIL et al
as 1:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER HARGETT
Defendant:
RODERICK VIRGIL, DANIEL HEADRIX, AMY COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARGETT v. VIRGIL et al
as 1:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN A. HARGETT
Defendant:
RODERICK VIRGIL, DANIEL HEADRIX, AMY COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amy Spahr, et al v. Amy Collins, et al
as 22-2879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY SPAHR and MATTHEW CAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
AMY COLLINS and RAMONA MIRA
Amy Spahr, et al v. Amy Collins, et al
as 22-2787
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMY SPAHR and MATTHEW CAIN
Defendant / Appellant:
AMY COLLINS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAMONA MIRA
COLLINS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00479
Petitioner:
AMY COLLINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Spahr et al v. Collins et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cain and Amy Spahr
Defendant:
Ramona Mira, Jane Powell and Amy Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nautilus Insurance Company v. JDW Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00190
Plaintiff:
Nautilus Insurance Company
Defendant:
JDW Inc , Amy Collins and James Mick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradford v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 4:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Bradford
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A., Dana Kuehn, K Renee Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
