Cases 1 - 10 of 480
Alexander v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2942
Plaintiff:
ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, former Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
VERMA v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
ANAND VERMA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PC) Ramirez v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, E. McDaniel, Mehta Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaur, D.D.S. et al v. Jeorgos et al
as 1:2024cv10548
Plaintiff:
Amandeep Kaur, D.D.S. and Amandeep Kaur, D.D.S. P.C.
Defendant:
Elvisa Jeorgos, Tyanna Yaman, Aparna Khanna, D.M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Roy v. Romano et al
as 5:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rex S. Jackson, Rick Wilmer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
