Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Conte v. Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions Inc., et al.
as 1:2024cv10605
Plaintiff:
Laura Conte
Defendant:
Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions Inc. doing business as Advanced Medical Pricing Solutions "AMPS", Cimarron Healthcare Capital and James Nadauld
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02571
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions, Inc.
Central Valley Ag Cooperative v. Daniel Leonard, et al
as 20-1378
Defendant / Appellee:
GMS Benefits, Inc., Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions, Inc., Advanced Medical Pricing Solutions, Inc., The Benefit Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Linus G. Humpal
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Central Valley Ag Cooperative, for itself and as Fiduciary of the Central Valley Ag Cooperative Health Care Plan
Plaintiff:
Central Valley Ag Cooperative Health Care Plan
Central Valley Ag Cooperative, et al v. Daniel Leonard, et al
as 19-3044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Central Valley Ag Cooperative Health Care Plan and Central Valley Ag Cooperative, for itself and as Fiduciary of the Central Valley Ag Cooperative Health Care Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
GMS Benefits, Inc., Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions, Inc., Advanced Medical Pricing Solutions, Inc., The Benefit Group, Inc. and others
Central Valley Ag Cooperative et al v. Leonard et al
as 8:2017cv00379
Defendant:
Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions, Inc., Claims Delegate Services, LLC, GMS Benefits, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Central Valley Ag Cooperative and Central Valley Ag Cooperative Health Care Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions, Inc. v. Health Systems Management Integration
as 0:2014cv01380
Plaintiff:
Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Health Systems Management Integration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
