Cases 1 - 8 of 8
REVERS v. UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER , MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION et al
as 2:2022cv01700
Plaintiff:
T. J. REVERS, GERALD PORTO, ANTONINO BALSAMO and others
Defendant:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL UNION 1211, ROSS McCLELLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Davis v. Target Corporation
as 0:2020cv00490
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davis
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Andrew Davis v. Solvay USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00485
Defendant:
Solvay USA, Inc., Charles Capers, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andrew Davis v. Solvay USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01805
Defendant:
Solvay USA, Inc., Charles Capers, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Goldberg, Lindsay & Co., LLC et al
as 1:2018cv09945
Defendant:
Goldberg, Lindsay & Co., LLC, Lindsay Goldberg, LLC, John F. Aiello and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
FUSCO v. HAYNES et al
as 2:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J FUSCO
Undetermined:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Defendant:
KIM E DAVIS, KATIE DOHERTY, NOEL L HAYNES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Davis v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01807
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davis
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Byrd et al v. International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, Local 1248, a labor union, et al
as 4:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
Linwood Byrd , Belinda Ashby , Stewart Ashby, Jr. and others
Defendant:
International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, Local 1248 and Hampton Roads Shipping Association
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
