Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Harris v. Woodbolt Distribution, LLC
as 3:2019cv02493
Defendant:
Woodbolt Distribution, LLC and Woodbolt Distribution, LLC doing business as Nutrabolt
Plaintiff:
Andrew Harris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Smith v. Cook et al
as 3:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Andrew Harris, Bo McClome and Dale Cook
Plaintiff:
Jakob Wayne Commadore Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cook et al
as 3:2019cv00289
Defendant:
Bo McCulome, Andrew Harris and Dale Cook
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03059
Plaintiff:
THELMORE CUMBY, AUSTIN DYER, SETH SOUTHERLAND and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02024
Plaintiff:
Thelmore Cumby, Austin Dyer, Seth Southerland and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Terrence Harris v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-2640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE ANDREW HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL
Terrence Harris v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-2582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE ANDREW HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Terrence Harris v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-2419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE ANDREW HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. Larry Obhof, et al
as 19-3551
Petitioner / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and ADAM KINCAID
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NORTHEAST OHIO YOUNG BLACK DEMOCRATS, SARAH INSKEEP, KATHRYN DEITSCH and others
Defendant:
FRANK LAROSE, Secretary of the State of Ohio, LARRY HOUSEHOLDER, Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives and LARRY OBHOF, President of the Ohio Senate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00183
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
