Cases 31 - 40 of 9,094
Marsh v. Kijakazi
as 4:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff:
Edwin S. Marsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sharona Kamali v. Andrew M. Saul
as 2:2021cv08006
Plaintiff:
SHARONA KAMALI
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Desmangles v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03039
Plaintiff:
Laureen Desmangles
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tornabene v. Saul
as 21-2317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jennifer Tornabene
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Morris v. Trump
as 21-2113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith S. Morris
Defendant / Appellee:
President Donald Trump, A.L.J. Roxanne Fuller, A.G. William P. Barr and others
Prince v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv01028
Plaintiff:
Robin R. Prince
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pierce v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
Amanda Pierce and Amanda G. Pierce
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jamal Parker v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, Jamal El Trust, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Ronnie Todd v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, DBA Ramael Blackwell El, AKA Ramael Blackwell El Trust, DBA Ronnie Ramael Todd
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, ESTATE OF RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, ESTATE OF RYAN RAMAEL TODD and others
Miller v. Saul
as 6:2021cv03218
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Miller
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
