Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Andrew Richardson v. City of Chicago, et al
as 13-2467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and DARRIN MACON, (3782)
Richardson v. Lone Star Capital Bank, N.A.
as 5:2011cv01054
Defendant:
Lone Star Capital Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Richardson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Wade et al
as 2:2011cv02233
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Robert L Wade, Jr., Andrew Richardson, Clinton Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Richardson v. Nixon State Bank
as 5:2011cv00914
Defendant:
Nixon State Bank
Plaintiff:
Andrew Richardson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers
Andrew Richardson v. Michael Barone, et al
as 11-3287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL BARONE, ATTY GEN PA and RAQUEL L. TAYLOR
Richardson v. Harris County Federal Credit Union
as 4:2011cv01550
Plaintiff:
Andrew Richardson
Defendant:
Harris County Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Richardson v. Houston Federal Credit Union
as 4:2010cv03768
Plaintiff:
Andrew Richardson
Defendant:
Houston Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
RICHARDSON v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv04024
Plaintiff:
ANDREW RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Counter_claimant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Counter_defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richardson v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2009cv05082
Plaintiff:
Andrew Richardson, Andrew Richardson and Andrew Richardson
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
RICHARDSON v. BARONE et al
as 1:2009cv00118
Petitioner:
ANDREW RICHARDSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL BARONE and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
