Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Miguel Angel Chavez Mora v. Ricolcol
as 5:2023cv02108
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Chavez Mora
Respondent:
Warden Ricolcol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Angel Chavez v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv01581
Plaintiff:
Angel Chavez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chavez v. USA
as 1:2021cv01195
Petitioner:
Angel Chavez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chavez v. Tyson Foods
as 21-11110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maria Yolanda Chavez, Individually and on behalf of Minor LC and Estate of Jose Angel Chavez, Angel Chavez and Rita Elaine Cowan, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of Thomas David Cowan
Defendant / Appellant:
Tyson Foods, Incorporated, doing business as Tyson Foods and Tyson Fresh Meats, Incorporated
Chavez et al v. Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 3:2021cv01184
Plaintiff:
Maria Yolanda Chavez, Angel Chavez and Rita Elaine Cowan
Defendant:
Axiom Medical, Tyson Foods, Inc. d/b/a Tyson Foods doing business as Tyson Foods, Transplace Texas, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Maria Chavez Hernandez, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60548
Petitioner:
BRAYAN ERIK NIEVES CHAVEZ, ALEX ARTURO NIEVES CHAVEZ, JOSE YAHIR NIEVES CHAVEZ and others
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00395
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01345
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
