Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01126
Plaintiff:
Allen Angel Smith
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections and Julie Fink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections et al
as 7:2021cv00450
Plaintiff:
Allen Angel Smith
Defendant:
Virginia Dept. of Corrections and Dr. Julie Fink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Aminta Smith
as 21-4190
Defendant / Appellant:
AMINTA A. SMITH, a/k/a Ashley Smith, a/k/a Angel Smith
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SMITH v. RGIS, LLC
as 2:2016cv00841
Plaintiff:
JONNA ANGEL SMITH
Defendant:
RGIS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ortega et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv29742
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Loretta Ortega , Mable Bohannon , Sybil Willoughby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortega et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2014cv00719
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Loretta Ortega , Mable Bohannon , Sybil Willoughby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ortega et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as NM/1:14-cv-00719
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Loretta Ortega , Mable Bohannon , Sybil Willoughby and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00976
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
NEELY v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
as 3:2014cv01030
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN NEELY
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORP. , ANGEL SMITH, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cross_claimant:
ARAMARK CORP.
Cross_defendant:
ABC COMPANIES, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and ANGEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
